I can go all week talking about the First Amendment
but many of you would simply parse through the parts you want to hear and
remain butt hurt over the rest.
The First Amendment as adopted in 1791 reads as
follows:
|
So what does that really cover in our times? More
than you think. Read the five points below to understand its reach and
limitations:
Establishment of religion
The United States of America is not solely a
Christian nation. Although three out of four of us proclaim the title (living
it is an entirely different beast, which I’ll delve into some other time), neither
the individual states nor the Federal government can set up a church or pass
laws that benefit one religion over another. For example, private schools such
as Pulaski Academy and Episcopal cannot use public funds from the Little Rock
School District to pay for transportation (read: busing) while its charters
limit the student type or necessitate a financial need greater than necessary. Understand
that the real reason why Puritans came over from England was to escape having
to live under the state-led Church of England so they could practice their
religion freely; taxation came later. This portion of the First Amendment was
intended by President Jefferson as a “wall between church and state” that must
be kept high and impenetrable, not allowing for even the slightest breach.
Ask how that is going for the Republican-led state
Legislatures in Oklahoma and Arkansas as both groups attempt to place religious
monuments on federal lands.
Freedom of religion
This also allows for Peter Griffin to establish the
Church of the Fonz as he did in this Family Guy episode.
The freedom of religion allows for the freedom to
hold an opinion or belief, but not to take action in violation of social duties
or subversive to good order; however, it does not permit an anything goes
approach such as human sacrifice. Ruling otherwise would mean that the
profession of our faiths is greater than the law of the land and in effect
permit every citizen to become a law unto himself meaning government would
exist in name only. While the right to have religious beliefs is absolute, the
freedom to act on such beliefs is not absolute. It also brings the blue laws
into question – for the unaware, blue laws restrict the sales of intoxicating
liquors on Sundays in many states to only restaurants and even then, only by
the drink. They – and the religious leaders/lobbyists - are also the reason why
the liquor and beer stores are closed on the first day of the calendar week.
Freedom of speech and of the press
This is where we are today: dissecting these seven words and in some
cases, twisting them around to fit our narratives. Even if we disagree with the
comments and manner of expression, it is within our basic fundamental rights as
American citizens to freely share how we feel. Saying or doing whatever we want
does not necessarily exempt us from criticism nor does it excuse us from being
idiots. For example, yelling “Fire!” or “Gun!” in a movie theater is a really
stupid thing to do and is a very dangerous exclamation in a crowded room with
one, two (or more, depending on the theater) exits due to the fact that someone
could be trampled on the way out. What if it a false alarm? The First Amendment
does not cover its protection as it was used to incite a violent reaction.
In the case of San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin
Kaepernick sitting through the national anthem due to the mistreatment of black
people by law enforcement and other institutions, he is acting according to the
letter of the amendment. The people who take issue with that are the same ones
who often advocate for a limited government as in justice for Just Us; the so-called overtaxed who
unwittingly do not realize the top taxation rates today are a fraction of what
they were when (to rose-colored glasses wearing conservatives, 1957) America
was its greatest before the Civil Rights Movement, Vietnam, etc.; war hawks who
manufacture conflict in strange places and within our own cities and suburbs to
line their pockets with profits bought by the lives of our young men and women
who are paying with their lives. Let us not forget there are pockets of people
who still think black people should only count as three-fifths of a person and
the best place for women is at home seen and not heard.
— A. Cedric Armstrong (@cedteaches) September 4, 2016
Welcome to an America where an elderly black man is
still called “boy” and an actual teenager is a “man” on the football field as
he stiff-arms defenders en route to the end zone or eludes sacks for a first
down.
Welcome to an America where Donald Trump can tell people
that America is not great to cheers but when Colin Kaepernick makes a similar
sentiment the boo birds fly in to poop on him.
Remember the true premise of the First Amendment. Or is it like justice (Just Us) in how it is doled around? #Kap pic.twitter.com/TeWeKVVnHE— A. Cedric Armstrong (@cedteaches) August 31, 2016
Welcome to an America where Black Lives Matter is
considered a terrorist group yet the Klan still exists in our schools, police
departments, businesses, city council and school board meetings, hospitals, and
churches without people batting an eye.
Welcome to an America where my goddaughter is
considered an adult at age ten (to some people) and thirty-year-old Ryan Lochte
is still a kid to the same folks.
#BlackFact pic.twitter.com/RsPFMMWk4y
— A. Cedric Armstrong (@cedteaches) September 26, 2016
I ain’t done yet. As a matter of fact, I’m just
getting started.
Freedom of speech also covers political speech even
as the state of Arkansas has historically tampered with the NAACP suppressing
its members identifying them publicly despite the White Citizens Council roster
of the day remaining anonymous. It also covers campaign finance (Citizens
United v. Federal Election Commission, 2010); flag desecration; falsifying
military awards; commercial speech; school speech (antiwar protests at Kent
State); obscenity (2 Live Crew); libel and slander; memoirs of convicted
criminals; and private action.
Freedom of the press
The free speech and free press clauses have been
interpreted to include writers and speakers except for wireless broadcasting
which had been given less constitutional protection. The Free Press Clause
protects the right of individuals to freely express themselves through
publication and dissemination of information, ideas, and opinions without
interference, constraint or prosecution by the government. This right has been
extended to the media including newspapers, video games, books, plays and
movies; as for bloggers (me) and other social media journalists, we do not have
the same protection yet our words are equally protected by the Free Speech
Clause and the Free Press Clause because both clauses do not distinguish
between media business and nonprofessional speakers. This is further shown by
the Supreme Court consistently refusing to recognize the First Amendment as
providing greater protections to the established media than to other
speakers: in other words, journalists
are being held more accountable for their words and locations than ever.
Freedom to petition and assemble peacefully
Freedom to petition and assemble peacefully
The Petition Clause protects the right “to petition
the government for a redress of grievances”. People do have the right to
communicate with government officials via lobbying and petitioning the courts
by filing lawsuits with a legal basis. It is also one of those freedoms the
privileged tend to have a problem with particularly when the disaffected is
clamoring for a right (women’s suffrage, black equality, the LGBTQ movement)
such as the rights to vote and marry whomever they choose simply because being
fair is seen as discriminatory to them. The right of access to the courts is
extended to all three branches of the government – Congress, the executive, and
the judiciary – as well as states through incorporation. In addition, the
Supreme Court construes “redress of grievances” broadly: not solely for the public to tie up the
courts in non-frivolous lawsuits but also to protect private interests seeking
personal gain. Pay-to-play litigation is
the name of the game at this level.
On a more localized level, we are protected by this
clause to express our interests, hopes, and desires to our leaders in order for
them to be heard publicly hence the town halls.
As Americans, we also have the right to assemble
peacefully although for many of my ancestors and contemporaries that has not
always been the case. Not too long ago, the general perception of seeing three
or more brothers in the South standing around in conversation was they were
troublemakers planning a revolt or assaulting someone. Just because someone is
an endorser of Black Lives Matter does not mean that he or she wishes that to
become public information as the membership, involvement or support is an
essential part of his or her freedom.
The First Amendment affords us a categorized list of
inalienable freedoms protected for all Americans to express ourselves without
retribution in theory; in practice, this country does have a mixed record of that
at best. When speaking out or standing up to protest an injustice, it covers
our best intentions to make our nation a greater place to live every day by
addressing and rectifying discrepancies. However, it does not give us the okay
to be idiots regarding the way we resolve our disagreements – in this day of
social media and the quick sound bite, we are prone to the worst of our
thoughts, minds, and keystrokes.
True fact even though a number of people won't like it. Do your research before trying to clap back, youngin. pic.twitter.com/yhhzruGn1T
— A. Cedric Armstrong (@cedteaches) September 15, 2017
Great article !
ReplyDelete